Blog / Industry / What Happened to Raydiant? How $50M in VC Funding Ended in a Distressed Asset Sale

What Happened to Raydiant? How $50M in VC Funding Ended in a Distressed Asset Sale

The full story of Raydiant's rise and fall — $50M raised, rapid expansion, lawsuits, acquisitions, all to have a distressed asset sale.

In May 2025, Displai announced it had acquired Raydiant's assets — products, technology, and customer contracts. The announcement was framed as a fresh start. But the structure of the deal told a different story: this was not a clean acquisition of a thriving company. It was an asset transfer after Raydiant had already slid into distress, with industry coverage from invidis later reporting that the Bay Area company had been up for sale but could not find a buyer for the whole business.

Raydiant's story matters beyond a single company because it is, to our knowledge, the most heavily venture-funded pure-play digital signage startup in history — roughly $50 million raised across three rounds. Its failure is a case study in what happens when Silicon Valley economics meet a market that rewards lean operations, focused products, and ruthless cost discipline.

The rise: 2017–2022

Raydiant was founded in April 2017 by Tuan Ho and venture studio Atomic, initially operating as Mira. In October 2019, the company rebranded and announced $7 million in financing led by 8VC, appointing Bobby Marhamat as CEO.

In January 2021, Raydiant raised a $13 million Series A co-led by 8VC and Atomic, with backing from Mark Wahlberg among others. At that point the company said it had more than 2,500 customers and had "more than tripled" revenue in 2020. Two months later came the acquisition of Hoopla, an employee performance platform. Digital signage was no longer the only product.

In early 2022, Raydiant acquired Sightcorp (AI audience analytics, spun out of the University of Amsterdam) and announced a $30 million Series B — though SEC filings showed a discrepancy, with the Form D listing a $25 million offering and approximately $20 million sold at the time of filing. The company publicly claimed total funding of $50 million, said it had nearly 4,500 customers, and reported 357% year-over-year revenue growth in 2021.

Then came the expansion. A Vilnius office with plans for 130 hires by end-2023 — Eurofound's restructuring monitor recorded the expansion programme and noted the unit already employed about 20 people at announcement. Additional offices in Vancouver and Amsterdam. Five executive hires across finance, strategy, product, customer success, and go-to-market, with plans to add more than 200 employees in 2022. The September 2022 acquisition of Perch pushed further into smart shelves and retail AI.

By August 2024, Raydiant was on the Inc. 5000 for the third consecutive year and claiming nearly 5,800 brands as customers.

The pricing problem

This is the part of the story with the most direct relevance to anyone evaluating signage vendors.

G2's pricing page for Displai, citing materials last updated in October 2024 (while the product was still branded as Raydiant), listed a one-screen plan at $49 per month ($588/year) plus $169 for hardware, with a 14-day free trial. A Birmingham municipal procurement — 15 enterprise subscriptions, a premium licence, 15 ScreenRay devices, and shipping — came to a total not exceeding $18,751 over two years, implying roughly $52 per screen per month all-in. Raydiant's partner sales page also structured commissions around $49/month per screen. And a Raydiant support page priced the ScreenRay device at $199 plus tax and shipping.

Compare that to what the rest of the market charges today:

Raydiant was charging 5–8× more than every major competitor for a core product — content on screens — that was not 5–8× better. Raydiant had more features on paper (kiosks, employee engagement, AI analytics), but those were additions most small businesses never asked for. The base signage experience — uploading content, scheduling playlists, managing screens remotely — was comparable across all of these platforms. The premium features existed to justify the premium price, not because the market demanded them.

For a 10-screen restaurant, the annual cost difference is stark: $5,880 on Raydiant versus $720 on Brix. That's $5,160 per year — real money for a business operating on 3–5% margins.

Estimating Raydiant's revenue from what's public

Raydiant never published their revenue. The growth percentages in press releases — "more than tripled" in 2020, "357% year-over-year" in 2021 — are directional signals, not audited figures. After 2021, the company shifted from revenue claims to customer-count claims, which is often a sign that the revenue story became harder to tell.

But we can estimate from what's verified. Raydiant disclosed customer counts at three points:

At the verified entry price of $49/screen/month, the revenue estimate depends heavily on average screens per customer — a number Raydiant never disclosed. With such high prices, you would expect some discounts to be given to larger customers.

Even though they had raised $50 million, Raydiant employed 100+ people, and was operating from San Francisco with offices across four countries. At San Francisco compensation, 100 employees alone could represent $20–$30 million in annual payroll and benefits — before rent, hardware costs, cloud infrastructure, sales commissions, or many acquisitions.

The only verified hard revenue numbers come from the Lithuanian subsidiary's registry data: €1.25 million in 2022, €1.67 million in 2023, and €1.61 million in 2024 (with a net loss of €98,756 in 2024). That's a fraction of the global business, but the trajectory — growth flattening, then turning loss-making — was an indication of things to come.

The collapse: 2024–2025

From the outside, the collapse happened fast.

In late 2024, CEO Bobby Marhamat publicly said he was leaving after five and a half years. The San Francisco Business Times reported that winners of Raydiant's "Rising Entrepreneur" real-estate competition said they had received none of the promised benefits, and that one winner was suing. Raydiant reportedly countersued and referred to itself as a startup of "modest means" — a striking self-description for a company that had publicly announced $50 million in funding.

In March 2025, tech.eu reported that former Lithuanian employees were publicly alleging unpaid wages, blocked system access, and insolvency manoeuvring. The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre mirrored the allegations.

Lithuanian registry data show insured employees falling from 17 in January 2025 to 15 in March, 8 in May, 1 in June, and 0 by July. The Lithuanian entity entered court-supervised bankruptcy proceedings on May 6, 2025. A separate collections case — Video Elephant v. Raydiant Inc. (case CGCU25627207) — was filed in San Francisco in July 2025.

On May 16, 2025, Displai acquired the assets.

Why it failed

The Silicon Valley cost problem

Raydiant was, to our knowledge, the only pure-play digital signage startup based in Silicon Valley and funded at Silicon Valley scale. Its SEC filing listed the headquarters at 35 Stillman Street, San Francisco. Property records and a leasing brochure identify the building as roughly 10,914 square feet with an asking rate of $50/sq ft/year — implying approximately $545,700 in annual rent. CBRE's San Francisco data shows market averages were even higher at $75.86/sq ft in Q4 2022, meaning any lease signed during the boom could have been even more.

Compare that to how every major competitor is structured:

These companies compete for the same restaurant and retail customers with substantially similar core signage products. The difference is that a lean team in Los Angeles or teams in Athens or Bangkok can sustain $8/screen, while a 100+ person team in San Francisco needed $49/screen just to keep the lights on — and even that wasn't enough.

Strategy sprawl

Three acquisitions in 18 months (Hoopla, Sightcorp, Perch) plus an organic product launch (FEXP). Each added a new category without a proportional revenue lift. Raydiant's own January 2023 product launch acknowledged it was still "completing" the integration of its acquisitions — nearly a year after the last deal closed.

The features that justified the premium pricing — AI analytics, smart shelves, employee engagement, kiosks — were features most digital signage customers never asked for. A restaurant owner wants a menu on a screen. Raydiant built an "experience operating system" and charged accordingly, but the addressable market for a $49/screen AI-powered experience platform is far smaller than the addressable market for a $6/screen menu board.

The capital market turned

The 2023 PitchBook-NVCA Venture Monitor documented the shift: non-traditional investor participation fell sharply, crossover rounds dropped 50% from 2022, and deal sizes shrank. Raydiant built a cost structure for the 2021 capital market and ran into the 2023–2025 one.

Customer economics

The National Restaurant Association reports that average food and labor costs have each risen roughly 35% over five years, while pre-tax margins sit between 3% and 5%. When a restaurant is fighting for margin, a $49/month per-screen subscription is an easy line item to cut — especially when a $6/month alternative exists that does what the vast majority want - getting easy to update menus on the screen.

What happened to Raydiant's customers

Displai said it acquired products, technology, and customer contracts, welcomed many former employees, and would prioritise continuity. The company is led by Tuan Ho — Raydiant's original founder.

The strategic narrowing is notable: both invidis and Displai's own messaging focus on restaurants and hospitality. Current Displai pricing on G2 sits at $49/month for one screen — essentially unchanged from Raydiant's historical entry point. Capterra lists current pricing as "contact vendor" for larger deployments.

Raydiant customers in non-hospitality verticals should assume the roadmap will favour hospitality going forward.

What this means for anyone buying digital signage

1. Cost structure is competitive strategy. Where a vendor operates and how they're structured directly determines whether they can offer $6–$10/screen sustainably. Raydiant's Bay Area base required pricing the market would not bear and struggled to show return on investment on software that was almost 10x the cost of Brix.

2. Features don't justify premium pricing if nobody uses them. Raydiant built AI analytics, smart shelves, employee engagement, and kiosks on top of a signage platform. Most of its customers just wanted content on a screen. The premium features existed to justify the premium price — but they didn't justify it enough.

4. VC funding is not a moat. If anything, it causes the company to constantly grow for new customers, expand existing customers and bring in new products to cross-sell. Raydiant raised more than any pure-play digital signage company we know of. That funding created a cost structure that amplified pressure when the market tightened. For SMBs evaluating vendors, a company's funding history is not a signal of reliability. Operational sustainability is.

5. Pricing tells you who a company is built for. If a platform charges $49/screen, it needs $49/screen to survive. If it charges $6/screen, it's built for a world where small businesses need affordable tools that just work. The price isn't just what you pay — it reveals whether the company's economics can sustain themselves.

At Brix, we built deliberately in the opposite direction: flat $6/screen/month pricing, a focused product, and a cost structure that doesn't require venture capital subsidies to sustain.

Start your free 7-day Brix trial →


Further reading:

Ready to get started?

Open Brix Portal